We Need to Accept Sexual Diversity, Not that Sex Is ‘Natural’

A few months ago, there was a post made in response to writing by asexuals which, among other things, said that a core concept of sex-positivity is that “sex is natural and normal” and that it is this concept specifically which needs to be promoted to stop various forms of unjust violence and oppression. Furthermore, the blogger asserts that the reason why certain groups of Christians oppress homosexuals is because they find *sex in itself* disgusting, not because they are specifically disgusted by homosexual sex, and therefore the way to fight that oppression is to say that sex is positive.

I am not linking to that post because this is about the general idea, not the specific post, and I do not want to single out that blog post.

First, I highly recommend reading “On Christians & the Sanctification of Sex”. The summary is that there are very few American Christians who believe that sex is bad – in fact, most Christian sects go out of their way to say that sex is a ‘gift from God’ or something in that vein. Of course, many Christian sects only approve of certain forms of sex, but generally, religious Christians think that sex is good.

And it’s not just Christianity – I dare you to find a single mainstream religion (i.e. a religion which is not considered fringe or extremist) which claims that sex between a man and a woman in a monogamous marriage is not a good thing.

I did not come from a conservative religious background myself, but I have read the accounts of many asexuals who have (here is an example), and it seems that conservative religious people are just as likely to be make asexual people feel broken and unworthy as other people in mainstream society.

That’s why, when ‘sex-positive’ people declare that ‘sex is good’ as if there is anyone in mainstream society who disagrees with that assertion, I scratch my head. It seems that they are straw-manning the people they are trying to criticize (such as conservative Christian fundamentalists). Actually, I suspect that it something deeper. They have so internalized the extremely mainstream idea that ‘sex is good’ that they are parroting it to signal that they are being reasonable and respectable to mainstream society, rather than to break with mainstream society.

You know what would be a real break from mainstream society? Asserting a radical acceptance of sexual diversity. One which promotes acceptance of all sexual orientations and genders, and tolerates all sexual behaviors – including never ever having sex – which do not cause unjust harm. Of course, not everyone is going to agree about what counts as ‘unjust harm’ of course, which makes putting this principle into practice tricky.

Notice that this principle is neutral on the question on whether or not sex is ‘good’. The core message is ‘sexual diversity’ not ‘sex is good’.

Finally, there is this article from Psychology Today which presents research that indicates that prejudice against sexual minorities is based on their deviance from the social norm, and not, in the case of sexual minorities who have sex, based on the sex they are having. For example, the research found that religious fundamentalists were prejudiced against homosexuals who were celibate, even though they are not having sex.

Some ‘sex-positive’ people are supportive of asexuality and other groups who are less ‘sexual’ than the social norm, and that is cool. However, I have also seen many examples of ‘sex-positive’ people shaming asexual and other less ‘sexual’ people and telling them that they are unnatural and abnormal (and yes, if your core message is ‘sex is natural and normal’, you are loudly implying that people who do not have sex are unnatural and abnormal). In short, they are shaming people not because those people have done anything harmful, but because they are deviating from a social norm. In other words, those sex-positive people are acting in a completely mainstream and, dare I say it, conservative way.

The way to help sexual minorities is to accept diversity, not to join the chorus of mainstream society in saying that sex is so great.


CC0


To the extent possible under law,
the person who associated CC0
with this work has waived all copyright and related or neighboring
rights to this work.

7 thoughts on “We Need to Accept Sexual Diversity, Not that Sex Is ‘Natural’

  1. Pingback: Linkspam: September 30th, 2016 | The Asexual Agenda

  2. Late to the party, but…

    As an ace and former Christian, realizing that I had at one point found “sex in itself disgusting” made me *less* inclined to think badly of homosexual people, not *more* so. After all, both heterosexual and homosexual sex were on equal footing by that measure!

    While I can’t speak much to the phenomenon of people declaring “sex is natural” to the mainstream world, I do see the phrase used a lot when speaking to allosexual purity culture victims who have internalized the message that “sex is bad” (before marriage) so deeply that they seem unable to overcome that feeling post-marriage. These people often feel “broken” as well, since their culture officially considers sex to be a good thing (after marriage).

    • I have read about that problem with purity culture as well (though I do not have any first-hand experience with purity culture).

      I myself grew up in San Francisco. That says very little about my family, since there are families with all kinds of views on sexuality throughout the city (including a lot of families with ‘conservative’ ideas about sex – San Francisco used to be the most Catholic city in the United States, and about 25% of the population still identifies as Catholic). However it meant I attended public schools in San Francisco, and the sex education there is ‘sex is natural, and everyone is a sexual being, so learn how to do it safely so you can have fun’ (with the exception of my middle school science teacher, who had a more neutral approach to teaching sex ed). It was good sex ed in the sense that we got important information about birth control and STDs, but not helpful for me coming to terms with my asexuality.

  3. I’m considering translating this post to Portuguese. As most of your posts are released under public domain (CC0), and https://thenoteswhichdonotfit.wordpress.com/about/ says your work is released as CC0, am I right to assume this post is under public domain too?

    I just want to be sure before starting, as I don’t want to make you unhappy by translating without permission. If it’s CC0 too, could this info be added to the post?

  4. Pingback: Diversidade sexual vs ‘sexo é bom’ – Anders Bateva

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.