I’m working on a draft of a blog post about Leave No Trace and my experiences with camping. Working on that draft, I started thinking about the chemical impact of tents on the environment, so I decided to do some research, and then decided that this topic was important enough to merit its own blog post.
Spoiler: My palace (i.e. tent) is probably carcinogenic.
Most backpacking tents contain toxic chemicals. There are different types of toxic chemicals they may maintain.
One types of toxic chemical is fluorocarbons. They help waterproof fabrics, including tent fabrics. They also wash off fabric when it rains or water is otherwise applied to the fabric, and they damage the ecosystem, and since they are persistent (i.e. it takes a long time for them to break down) they can spend a lot of time damaging the ecosystem. Lovely. Oh, and fluorocarbons are also bad for humans because they are hormone-disruptors.
I had already been aware that many rain jackets / shells / etc. contain fluorocarbons, that they are a toxic pollutant, that fluorocarbons have been found in even the most ‘pristine’ wilderness areas, and that was one reason I chose fluorocarbon free rain gear for my big hike in Washington (which I ended up not using much because it only rained twice, but if it had rained a lot, my rain gear would not have poisoned the trail ecosystem with fluorocarbons).
However, I had not thought about whether my tent contained fluorocarbons.
Does my tent have fluorocarbons? I do not know, and I have not asked the manufacturer (Big Agnes). Based on my research, my guess is that my tent probably does not contain fluorocarbons. However, that is an educated guess, not a certainty, and maybe I’ve guessed wrong.
Another common type of toxin found in tents are PVC and VOCs (volatile organic compounds). They cause cancer and mess up the ecosystem. The manufacturer of my tent says that my tent is PVC and VOC free, so I don’t have to worry about that, hurray! I will have to pay attention to that if I ever get another tent.
And then there are flame retardants. You can learn many of the gory details by reading this article. The TL;DR is: flame retardants cause cancer, do NOT improve fire safety, and for legal reasons, are found in the vast majority of the tents sold in the United States and Canada. Lovely.
I did contact Big Agnes (the manufacturer of my tent) to ask about flame retardants. Their answer was: ALL OF THEIR TENTS CONTAIN FLAME RETARDANTS. They have not told me which flame retardants they use, but the range for flame retardants (in terms of toxicity and effectiveness in fire safety) is not good thru bad, it’s bad thru horrible. If I get a list of the specific fire retardants they use, all that would tell is is whether they are on the bad end of the spectrum, or the horrible end of the spectrum, and I do not think that information would affect my decisions.
I repeat, BIG AGNES HAS TOLD ME THAT ALL OF THEIR TENTS CONTAIN FLAME RETARDANTS.
I understand that they probably do it for legal reasons, and I thank them for telling me.
Though I did not get this information from Big Agnes, based on my research, it seems that the flame retardants are most likely in the PU coating. If this is so, that means that they are probably not leeching much into the environment (like fluorocarbons, flame retardants are bad news for the ecosystem). On the other hand, they are in the area where I sleep.
So now what? Here are my options:
OPTION 1: REPLACE MY PALACE WITH A NEW TENT
I love my tent! This would make me sad. But knowing that my tent might give me cancer will definitely affect my love for my tent, and will possibly make it harder for me to sleep in my tent.
This would also raise the question of how I would dispose of my tent. Landfill? Let it sit in my closet indefinitely? Sell it – “Hey, I’ve stopped using this tent because it causes cancer – want to buy it?”
[UPDATE: I did sell my ‘palace’]
Also, this means I would have to get a new shelter. High-quality shelters tend to be expensive, so that would hit my wallet hard. Or I could get a tarp shelter, but they require a lot more skill than tents.
[UPDATE: I did sew my own tarp and put it into use, see this post]
Oh, and I would have to make sure my new tent was also fluorocarbon and flame retardant free, which would exclude most of the tents sold in the USA and Canada because of the legal requirements to poison campers. What tents are fluorocarbon & FR free? The Moonlight tents are fluorocarbon and FR free – and the lightest one weighs about 5 pounds. That weight is a dealbreaker for long-distance use (and I don’t use tents for short-distance purposes often enough to justify buying a tent just for short-distance trips). It looks like, based on the description, that the tent has a lot of cool features, but I would be happy to get rid of some of those features to reduce the weight.
Based on this, its seems that for legal reasons, any tent sold by a major retailer in the USA (such as REI) will have the flame retardants. A tent manufacturer based in the USA but not located in any of the states which require flame retardants in tents and which does not sell through retailers in those states is not legally required to use flame retardants, which limits me to tent manufacturers who do not distribute through retailers across the USA/Canada.
I do not know whether cuben fiber tents contain flame retardants or not. If I ever decided I wanted a cuben fiber tent, I would ask the manufacturers about this. Since I do not want to buy a cuben fiber tent, I am not going to research it at this time. However, one manufacturer of cuben fiber shelters, Mountain Laurel Designs, says that all of their bug netting fabric has flame retardants. That rules out any shelter with bug netting, cuben fiber or no cuben fiber.
It seems the best way to get a lightweight shelter without flame retardants is to import from the UK or the EU. Their laws do not require tents to contain flame retardants, so most tent manufacturers there do not use flame retardants. Which means I may have another option…
OPTION 2: USE MY TAIWANESE TENT
I have used my Taiwanese tent on my PCT section hikes before I received my palace, so I know it can work on the PCT. It is also a brand which is not sold in the USA or Canada at all, so the manufacturer did not care about US/Canadian law. Does Taiwanese law require putting flame retardants in tents? I have no idea. I would have to do more research. I also do not know if my Taiwanese tent contains fluorocarbons. It is unlikely to have PVC or VOCs, but I would have to do additional research to confirm that. And doing research would be challenging since the tent model I have has been discontinued (which does not surprise me, since it is a pretty weird tent).
However, while I CAN use my Taiwanese tent on the PCT, there are reasons why I was willing to buy a new tent for use on the PCT (I continue to use my Taiwanese tent for all non-PCT camping trips). The most important reason was weight, though it also has less interior space and I think the tent poles are annoying (I prefer the 12 stakeouts on my palace to putting up the tent poles on my Taiwanese tent, which tells you just how much those tent poles annoy me). If I put my Taiwanese tent to serious use again, I would also want to buy new stuff sacks, because the current stuff sack sucks.
Nonetheless, if I did the research, and found that my Taiwanese tent had no fluorocarbons / PVC / VOCs / flame retardants, then that would be an option which would not require me to spend any extra money (beyond a new stuff sack, which is a lot cheaper than buying a new tent).
OPTION 3: CONTINUE USING MY PALACE, AND BE CAREFUL
As I said, the most toxic chemicals are probably in the interior coating, not the exterior coating, so continuing to use this tent may still be consistent with the principles of Leave Not Trace (I wouldn’t be leaving a trace on the environment, I’d just leaving a trace on my own body by exposing myself to carcinogens).
Research shows that the flame retardants rub off on hands when pitching a tent (you can read more about that research in the article I linked above), and that if those hands are later used to, say, eat food, the flame retardants can enter the body. However, when I am pitching my palace, I am mostly touching the exterior of the tent, not the interior, so I may not be getting into direct contact with the flame retardants. Finally, I usually pitch my tent with my gloves on (even in summer, I do all long-distance hikes with gloves), and I usually eat with my gloves off. I could make it a rule that I ONLY pitch my tent with gloves on and ONLY eat with gloves off.
When I’m inside my tent, I do put my gear in contact with the fabric. Research shows that flame retardants can rub off on gear too, but I would expect touching gear which touched flame retardant to be less bad than directly touching flame retardant. I do not directly touch the interior tent fabric often, and I can try to limit my direct contact with the interior tent fabric even more.
Not enough research has been done to show if there are other ways the flame retardants in tents can enter the human body. It is possible that it may coat dust in the tent, but AFAIK, this has not been proven. Just because is hasn’t been proven does not mean it’s not happening.
I have read that old PU coatings will flake, and I guess that the flame retardants would be in the flakes.
SO, WHAT AM I GOING TO DO?
For now, based on what I know, I am going with option three. If I ever see signs that the PU coating is flaking, then I will retire the tent, but until then, I will continue to use it with caution.
Another thing I’m going to try to do is bring more attention to this issue in the trail community. Even if I am successful in taking care of myself, I do not want tent manufacturers to poison my fellow hikers, nor do I want my fellow hikers to spread toxins around the wilderness. And if the trail community does not pay attention to this, then the situation is not going to get better.
Without clicking through on ahh of your links, my quick reaction is UGH is there ahh way we can push for the laws in the USA/Canada to be changed to not require the ineffective flame retardant carcinogens? It sounds like it would have to be the most populous states with the most influence or something, the people who buy the most from stores like REI.
Since I live in California, one of the states which requires the toxic flame retardants (and probably the state with the most sales), I can certainly contact my representatives in the California legislature and ask them to change the laws.
However, I do not think there is much chance of changing these laws unless big retailers, such as REI, push for change, and I think the best way to pressure REI is to refuse to buy their tents until there are FR-free options. I also think that the more organizations get involved, the more pressure there will be to change the laws (I am a PCTA member, and I plan to contact the PCTA about this issue).
REI has said this about flame retardants in tents.
And since any legal change is going to take time, I think it is also good to consider short-term solutions, such as supporting USA tent manufacturers who are exempt from these laws make FR-free tents, or importing tents from countries without these laws.
Pingback: Odyssey of a New Bed, Part 1 | The Notes Which Do Not Fit
Pingback: Sewing a Tarp by Hand Is Like Walking across the Entire State of Washington on Foot | The Notes Which Do Not Fit
I have gone with TheTentLab ….. Seems to be the safest option for a “clean tent”.
Yes, I think that the safest options for a full tent without sewing it oneself (at least in the North America). However, even their lightest tent is too heavy for me (especially since I am always the one one sleeping in my tent/tarp and I need to carry the full weight). I do use the Deuce UL Trowel.
What’s the name of the “Taiwanese tent?” In addition to being FR and fluorocarbon free, can you rate how bad it smells and to what degree the smell went away over time? Thanks!
It’s an Adisi brand tent which (when I looked it up a year ago) is no longer manufactured (they still make other tents, just not the specific model I have). I have never noticed it having any type of smell, but my sense of smell is weak.
Cool. I’ve done some research since last post. Naturehike tents are flame-retardant free and fluorocarbon free. There is one by featherstone on amazon that is fluorcarbon free and free of “harmful flame retardants.” I noticed you said you switched to fluorocarbon free rain gear, can I ask what brand?
The brand is Columbia, specifically their EcoJacket (I have their original one, but I think by now they have come out with variants?)
There are “PFC-Free” products out there that still use a fluorocarbon called PTFE. The official terminology is PFC EC (PFC free of environmental concern). However, I have come across a lot of pages that don’t include the “EC” part. I personally want something completely fluorocarbon-free (and also nano-technology free!) . I don’t know if that’s the case for Columbia’s Outdry Eco Extreme line? I contacted them awhile back asking if they use PTFE in their PFC-Free line but the rep.–after talking to an associate of his—would not answer. So unless they confirm to me that they don’t use any fluorocarbons in their PFC-Free products then I will not purchase those products. I was at one point really excited about that line, so this is a bummer to me 😦
I’m sorry that Columbia is not forthcoming with information. Since I already have the jacket, I’m keeping it, I’m sure it is still better than average (and doesn’t need to have water-repellant chemicals re-applied to it). I’ve read that the Columbia eco-jacket is coated with polyurethane, and that’s what makes it waterproof.
I also have a cuben fiber rain skirt. My understanding is that cuben fiber is PFC free, BUT may have its own environmental problems, is expensive as heck, and is non-breathable.
Pingback: Eighth Anniversary Blog Post | The Notes Which Do Not Fit