Here’s an overview of the situation as of May 16. You can also look at the summary of the bill itself, which says:
Under Article 4A of Chapter 14 of the General Statutes, Prohibited Secret Societies and Activities, it is generally a crime for an individual to wear a mask in public. However, under G.S. 14-12.11(a)(6), an individual can wear a mask in public for the physical health or safety of the wearer or others. If an individual wears a mask in public for health or safety reasons, a law enforcement officer can require the individual to remove the mask during traffic stops and criminal investigations when the officer has reasonable suspicion or probable cause.
Section 1 of the PCS would repeal G.S. 14-12.11(a)(6), and individuals would no longer be able to wear masks in public for health or safety reasons.
Some legislators proposed amendments which would continue to allow masking in public for physical health reasons. The legislature voted down those amendments.
A sponsor of the bill, Senator Newton, said “I would like to meet the law enforcement officer or the DA that wants to prosecute granny for wearing a mask in the Walmart. Unless she got arrested sticking steaks in her bag and trying to conceal her identity — then I could see it happening — and that’s what this bill is designed to address.”
Um, if he doesn’t want law enforcement officers or district attorneys to prosecute grannies for wearing masks in Walmart, then why does he support a bill that makes it illegal for granny to wear a mask in Walmart? If he only wanted it to be illegal for people to wear masks when they’re in the middle of criminal acts, he would’ve written it that way. He designed it the way he did, which means that’s his intention.
I can imagine a white law enforcement officer forcing a Black granny unmask in Walmart as an expression of racial prejudice. And under this law, that would be legal.
Continue reading